Show Sidebar Log in

Distant Mirrors and the LAMP

This is the text of the talk I delivered at the 2013 MLA Presidential Forum Avenues of Access session on “Digital Humanities and the Future of Scholarly Communication.” Slides (PDF) are available here. Comments welcome.

 

I attended my first MLA convention in 1996. I was a PhD student at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville at the time, and the MLA was just up the road in Washington DC. A bunch of us carpooled. Like many first time attendees, I had earnestly mapped out my convention schedule in the space provided at the front of the program. One session in particular stood out to me to me, premediated (as we now say) with arena rock-like production values: [SLIDE]

The Canon and the Web: Reconfiguring Romanticism in the Information Age,” organized by Alan Liu and Laura Mandell, two names very familiar to contemporary observers of the digital humanities. [SLIDE] The Web presence you see here—one of those distant mirrors of my title—had been placed online months prior to the convention, on May 26th to be exact. As Liu commented in a recent email to me, “I am struck (as you are) by how fleshed out that panel site was.” There are animated GIFs and gratuitous tables, yes, but there is also an evident will to situate the session amid a thick contextual network (the links to associated projects, related readings, and relevant sites); there is a clear desire for interactivity, as expressed through the live email links and the injunction to initiate correspondence; and there is also a curatorial sensibility which seems very contemporary to me, [SLIDE] most notably through the “Canon Dreaming” links which take users to collections of materials assembled by Liu and Mandell’s students—certainly prototypes of what we would today realize through, say, an Omeka installation. [SLIDE] Finally, there were the participants, complete with links to email and home pages alongside the thumbnail bios, an obvious early instantiation of the ubiquitous user profiles we routinely create for social media services. The names here reflect many who have continued to be thought leaders and key practitioners in the space we now call DH, and they were a key element of the panel’s appeal.

The other element, of course, was heralded directly in the session’s title and instantiated in this-then formidable site: the Web itself, which was clearly being celebrated not just as a convenience or contrivance for delivering content, but as a liberating force, a new paradigm, a corrective to the very notion of canonicity. But when I say “the Web itself,” what I really mean is the World-Wide Web, which we then dutifully spelled out complete with conjoining hyphen and glossed with the ghastly descriptor “the graphical portion of the Internet.” This World-Wide Web was not the same Web as the Web we have today, neither technically nor experientially nor aspirationally. There are continuities to be sure, but fewer than you might think. The Web then was still mostly flatland, the dominant issues being the HTML rendering idiosyncrasies of different browsers. (The war between Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator was only just starting to heat up.) The source code for the site invokes the DTD for HTML 3.2. The code itself, according to Liu, was most likely written in an editor called HoTMetaL, from SoftQuad. There is no XML or DHTML here. There is some rudimentary Javascript in the form of an earnest little site navigation widget. There is no commenting facility. There is no feed to subscribe to. There are no Twitter or Facebook sprites. This was 1996. My dearest friends, there was. no. Google. You Yahooed—there’s no shame, we all did—or summoned forth the awesome powers of Alta Vista. Attendees at the 1996 convention would have bragged about their Internet acumen by telling colleagues about ordering a book from something called Amazon.com. Ordering a pizza online you could only do if you were Sandra Bullock in The Net, released a year earlier. [SLIDE]

The real backbone of scholarly communication at the time remained listserv email. There was a rawness to it. You subscribed and you were on, sometimes pending moderator approval, usually more for spam control than anything else. Once you were on, you posted. Or lurked. Or flamed. Or accidentally hit reply-all when you meant to backchannel. But you didn’t have to worry about how many followers you had or if you were popular or pithy enough to be retweeted. You didn’t have to ask someone else if you could be their friend in order to converse with them. Strange, down-the-rabbit-hole geographies of influence formed, where the mainstay of a list would turn out to be a graduate student, or an emeritus at an obscure institution in New Zealand.

[SLIDE] The starting point for any discussion of email in the digital humanities must be the venerable HUMANIST listserv, whose first substantive message [SLIDE] is time-stamped 14 May 1987, 20:17:18 EDT, from one MCCARTY@UTOREPAS. This is, of course, Willard McCarty, who still edits the list to this day. HUMANIST: the name itself reminds us of a time when it was hard to conceive of a need for more than one listserv serving the academic humanities, that most general of titles serving to distinguish it from, say the LINGUIST list, which came along in 1990.

Humanist remains active today, its digests delivered regularly to, I suspect, a number of inboxes in this room. [SLIDE] Some of you may also follow an account on Twitter dubbed @hum_comp. The owner of this account, who wishes to remain anonymous, [SLIDE] is chronologically culling the Humanist archives, starting with the earliest entries, for tweet-length tidbits that either seem quaint or remain relevant. “I was immediately struck,” said the account owner to me via email, “by how similar they sounded to the conversations I [have] been listening to, and tentatively engaging in in 2009/2010. . . [T]he early HUMANIST listers saw much clearer than I ever did in the 1980s and 1990s what the challenges and promises of humanities computing and communication really were, right from the beginning of an expansive networked communication.” Thus: [SLIDE] [SLIDE]

The longevity of Humanist notwithstanding, by 1998 it was clear that many of the scholarly listservs that had sprung up in the first half of the decade were already living out their use horizon. One of the lists that was important to me at the time was entitled H-CLC, which was part of the H-Net consortium. [SLIDE] The CLC stood for Comparative Literature and Computers. In late November, 1997 Nelson Hilton wrote to it: “A growing number of inactive lists, it seems, have folded their tents and disappeared into the electronic night after a ritual call into the void met with resounding stillness. Perhaps it is a sign of advanced maturity in the medium — novelty has long worn off and we return to work at hand. If a list speaks to that work, we pause and read, perhaps respond — otherwise, quite rightly, why bother?” (Mon, 3 Nov 1997 10:33:21) “A sign of advanced maturity in the medium,” Hilton mused. I remind you, this was 1997.

The next Great Migration was to the blogosphere. Even as the lists were folding, the blogs began to spin up, built on nascent social networking scaffolding in the form of blogrolls, comments, trackbacks, and RSS feeds. Blogs are still very much with us today of course, but these were the salad days. Not WordPress or Blogger but Movable Type. Remember MT? [SLIDE] Or maybe you hacked your own. Some bloggers seemed to exist only in the interstices, “comment blogging” as some of us called it, living out their online identities in the long trellis of text that dangled from the bottom of prominent postings. Group blogs were a particularly notable feature of the scholarly landscape, with venues like The Valve, Crooked Timber, Wordherders, and Cathy’s HASTAC becoming daily reads for many wired academics. [SLIDE] For me, the most important such experiment was GrandTextAuto, which for five or six years was host to numerous important and intense conversations in digital studies, electronic literature, computer games, procedural literacy, and what we nowadays call critical code studies and software studies. [SLIDE] Its “drivers,” who included Scott Rettberg, Nick Montfort, Noah Wardrip-Fruin, Andrew Stern, Michael Mateas, and Mary Flanagan, created an active and energetic user community, one with sufficient gravitas and presence to spur the MIT Press to use it as the platform for the open peer review of Wardrip-Fruin’s first monograph, Expressive Processing. Today when I hit the site I get this. [SLIDE] When I emailed Nick to ask for his thoughts he said this to me, among other things: “Those of us who started out as graduate students took on professorial and administrative responsibilities, and there was less time available to play gadfly, perpetrate April Fool’s jokes, and explore aspects of projects through online discussion — instead, we had to write grants, teach classes, supervise graduate students, and so on. So, the heavy burden of responsibility, growing up, and so on.” For my part, I think the rise of Twitter also had a strong impact on the vitality of the blogosphere, even though, as I’ve written elsewhere, blogs and Twitter co-exist with one another in powerful mutually enabling ways.

[SLIDE] Which brings me to the new MLA Commons, launching this weekend here at the convention. [SLIDE] The MLA announcement states that it is intended “to facilitate active member-to-member communication” and “offer a platform for the publication of scholarship in new formats”—language that echoes, among other early electronic exemplars, the Welcome message from the Humanist listserv so long ago. The MLA Commons is built out from the CUNY Commons in a Box package which is built on top of the BuddyPress extensions to WordPress which itself depends on the Linux-Apache-MySQL-PHP LAMP stack of my title, four bedrock open source technologies that all existed, but were in their infancy, at the time of that 1996 Canon and Web panel. Working from the distant and very partially mirrored history of online scholarly communication I’ve been sketching, there are a few propositions I want to leave you with.

First, access always engenders power. Power dynamics are built in to our social networking services at the most basic level—indeed, the ability to define and operationalize various strata of relationship functions—trust, visibility, reciprocity—is arguably at the heart of the read/write Web. [SLIDE] To wit: for the past few days my email inbox has been regularly populated by messages from “MLA Commons” with the subject heading “New contact request.” [SLIDE] I’ve accepted them all, including the ones from people I don’t really know, because the platform is new and my instinct is to err on the side of openness. But I don’t accept all Friend requests on Facebook (nor are all of my earnest solicitations accepted) and I don’t follow back everyone who follows me on Twitter even as I do follow people I’d give my eye teeth to have follow me—but alas, they don’t. As MLA Commons gains steam, at what point do the filters go up, to an extent replicating existing power dynamics in the profession? Do I accept contacts from everyone in my home department? Does someone with a convention interview send contact requests to members of a search committee? If they do, is it presumptuous? If they don’t, are they anti-social in the most literal sense? Do I accept all contact requests from those of a higher professional rank than me? Accept no contact requests from those of lower rank? Anyone who manages their relationships so coarsely is missing the point and very likely has life problems far greater than their facility with online social networking, but given that reputation metrics (whether in the form of Web 2.0 services like Klout or scholarly rankings such as the social sciences’ H-Index) are operationalized in the very marrow of our online media, including digital publications and citations, we’d be mistaken to believe that these concerns are extraneous or can be entirely sidestepped by any mature scholarly communications network. It’s not a reason not to have a Commons, but it is a reason to be mindful of the relational and procedural models built in to its fabric, especially given the varied technologies the end-user experience rests upon.

Access also always entails risk. [SLIDE] I have had a home page on the Web since the summer of 1995. [SLIDE] In 1997 I began writing my dissertation online, not quite “live,” more of a time-shift as I edited and managed different document technologies, but always posting the prose in full, not just excerpts. [SLIDE] My inspiration here was Harlan Ellison, who regularly wrote short stories seated in the window of community bookstores. In 1977 he did it for a full week, a story a day, in a Los Angeles bookshop. I recognized early on that the Web had the potential to be an even more perfect panopticon; no great stretch, but I was also in touch with enough of my baser instincts to understand that visibility and feedback the project seemed likely to attract would entice me and keep me going. Inevitably I was asked whether I was worried about people plagiarizing my work. Again, this was in the era before blogs, and indeed most middle-state writing online; the equivalent of the blog essay, or “blessay” as Dan Cohen has called it, was mostly confined to listservs and text files distributed via FTP drops—very different from the agora of an open Web indexed by even pre-Google search engine technology. My response to the question about plagiary was to invoke another literary authority, specifically Poe’s purloined letter. [SLIDE] Hiding my ideas in plain sight, I argued, was the single best way to get them into circulation and ensure the necessity of referencing and citing them (as opposed to merely swiping them). And for the most part, I was right. The experiment paid real professional dividends. It got my work an audience, airtime in front of the eyeballs I most wanted for it, and the work was judged usually though by no means universally favorably. More I could not ask for, and I carried the same ethos over into my blogging, which began in early 2003. [SLIDE] From the outset I blogged under my own name, and I wrote a response—a blessay, I suppose—explaining why when Ivan Tribble (remember all that trouble with Mr. Tribble?) penned a 2005 piece for the Chronicle of Higher Ed called “Bloggers Need Not Apply.” In the comments I asked others to weigh in with examples of the professional dividends their online identities and reputations had reaped, and I collected several dozen instances further testifying to the power of, as the title of Phil Agre’s classic text has it, “networking on the network.” [SLIDE] I got onto Twitter in 2006, again perhaps just ahead of the adopters’ curve. Nonetheless, I come before you today to say this: I have not blogged every good idea I have ever had. I have not tweeted every insight or reference or revelation. There’s stuff I keep to myself, or better, stuff I release strategically rather than spontaneously, and it will fall to all of us, on MLA Commons and elsewhere, to find our own personal and professional comfort zones regarding what we give out to our contacts and groups, the membership at large, the public at large. Access always entails risk, and while we know scholarship is not a zero-sum game, more tangible and no less sustaining forms of reputation and reward sometimes even often are.

Finally, access always requires time. One scenario, I suppose, is that our online interactions will eventually progress to the point that genre and platform dissolve. Our work becomes our discourse stream, and a comment, a tweet, a blessay, or a monograph will all become part of it, winding more or less tightly within and amid the equally interwoven discourse strands of others. Fuzzy mathematics measuring out influence, recognition, and trust will iterate and calculate in real-time as our conversations thrive, hum, surge, and falter in the collective hive. Rivals will wage guerilla flame campaigns across the endlessly reticulating strata of the network, their memes warring with one other, spawning algorithmic eddies and tides that will buffet entire fields and disciplines. Tenure, if it still exists, may be based on cycles of attention rather than the accumulation of publications—propagate or perish. But I don’t think so. For one thing, platforms are perhaps further from interoperability than ever; Bruce Sterling, for example, predicts that 2013 will be the year of silos and tactically burned and broken bridges. Genres may indeed fray around the edges, but in the end every comment, every sentence blogged and logged, every essay chapter finished and book published is a withdrawal from the finite bank of productivity that is shaped by our individual intellects, our irreducible bodies with all their vulnerabilities, our jobs, our responsibilities, our loved ones, our hobbies and distractions and vacations and time in the woods. [SLIDE] Which is to say that however much attention spans may be redefined and reconfigured—psycho-cognitively, neuro-chemically, and otherwise—most scholarly careers, for now and the foreseeable future, are still going to be measured out in fairly pedestrian ways, in the summer months and three-day weekends and that rare “empty” day during the semester, perhaps on fellowship or sabbatical if we’re lucky and privileged, often at the expense of an hour’s sleep or a movie with the rest of the family when we’re not. Our scholarly communications networks will either cohabitate with the myriad obligations of that ticking temporal complex, or they will lie fallow—most of us are too far out as it is, and not Google Waving but drowning.

So I would leave you with one final urging—that it’s not too soon for MLA Commons to be planning for its own planned obsolescence, or what Beth Nowviskie and Dot Porter have termed “graceful degradation.” Our social (and our scholarly) networks are ever more porous, but they have yet to become reliably portable. This is a problem. Relationship economies require enormous amounts of attention and investment, and for those of us who live active online professional lives, a non-trivial amount of time is devoted to cultivating and aggregating those networks in diverse, subtle, and not-so-subtle ways. [SLIDE] Many of you have seen your own online networks shape-shift across listservs, blogs, and now the newest social media platforms. Universal avatars, imported contact lists, these are stop-gap measures; more promising for the next phase of scholarly communication may be mature personal unique identifiers, [SLIDE] as promised by ORCID, a service that “distinguishes you from every other researcher and, through integration in key research workflows such as manuscript and grant submission, supports automated linkages between you and your professional activities.” I’m currently on Twitter, Slideshare, Zotero, Google+, Facebook, and DH Answers, to name just a few. I want to migrate and port not just my content but also my reputation and relations. Regardless of if or when the MLA Commons folds its tent and decamps into that vast electronic night—hopefully not for a great many attention cycles—what should endure are the relationships it fosters and the work thus performed, the “work at hand” as Hilton put it on H-CLC. [SLIDE] Thank you and yes, do join, and do send me your contacts.

 

Matthew Kirschenbaum

@mkirschenbaum

University of Maryland

 

Tags: access, dh, mla13, s353

Discussion (3)

  1. Please send me the slides. Congrats

  2. Slides are now available from the link at the top of the paper. Thanks!

  3. Thank you for sharing! Almost like having been there ;-)

  4. [...] Matthew. “Distant Mirrors and the LAMP.” MLA Commons/Blog. 5 January [...]

  5. [...] Matthew Kirschenbaum, “Distant Mirrors and the LAMP” delivered as part of the  2013 MLA Presidential Forum Avenues of Access session on “Digital Humanities and the Future of Scholarly Communication”: http://commons.mla.org/docs/distant-mirrors-and-the-lamp/ [...]

  6. [...] “The Mirror and the LAMP,” by Matthew Kirschenbaum “Resistance in the Materials,” by Bethany Nowviskie [...]

  7. [...] Distant Mirrors and the LAMP (from the 2013 MLA Presidential Forum Avenues of Access session on “Digital Humanities and the Future of Scholarly Communication.”) [...]

  8. [...] Text of my 2013 MLA Presidential Forum Avenues of Access session on “Digital Humanities and the Future of Scholarly Communication.” Slides (PDF) are available here. [Also on MLA Commons.] [...]

  9. [...] the field of English, it seems as though we are already talking and interacting in public and online spaces above (or through) the paywall. The purpose of an academic paywall isn’t to protect [...]

  10. there are many variations. most writing handbooks

    are fairly similar in that they include guidelines for how to write, format, and check the grammar and sentence structure of your papers. if you have questions at any point during the writing process, you should be able to find what

  11. it can be difficult to compete for

    traffic. however, it’s also a good thing that blogs are being created by the millions every day. you see, not all web blogs will become successful in today’s online arena. and many will fail right from the start. so sit back

  12. for work) however, for the most part

    they will cause you big problems in the long run like: ostentatious grammar and 3rd grade spelling mistakes. mixed up verb tenses and copy that just doesn’t make sense. (this is common with non-native writers.) plagiarizers and thieves, they will eith…

  13. happen to you. i suggest that you

    write very clean blog posts and focus on the topic at hand.6. pillar articles are great for content. to make your blog stand out from the crowd, write pillar articles. these articles are designed to help someone solve a problem. they

  14. will profit in your business.good luck with

    getting tons of traffic to your blog today. i like marketing with blogs because they can be a free way to get traffic back to your website. a blog is like a diary. and depending on your niche, you will want

  15. good writing brings to the table.once you

    lay out the benefits, begin explaining why you are the writer they need. let them know the value you can bring to their business. show them how their traffic will increase and their revenue will increase when they hire you to

  16. meaning to the reader. in other words,

    your blog post will appear more interesting to readers if it is supported by good images.statistical facts give credibilitywhen you are writing about any topic, you can make a lot of value addition to it by adding statistics and relative figures

  17. your heart for the business, so better

    have a good start.writing the first postsif launching a blog requires laborious efforts, writing the first post needs tons of these.the first post should be the introduction. introduce yourself first, your blog, your niche, and your business. your futu…

  18. writing, keep an eye on the watch.

    remember that you will get only about 30 minutes to write your toefl essay. most test takers can write a good essay, but they need lots of time. if you are one among them, you require special practice.improve your vocabulary. learn

  19. be taught; they have to be cultivated

    in other ways. blogging is a key way to helping your child gain these skills. the main essential skill to have is to be able to concentrate long enough to learn a subject. young children usually have very short attention spans

  20. you become a skilled professional in the

    skill you are learning. writing for the web is just like that too. for professional online writer you have to write more and more until you feel you can even write in your sleep.6. read relevant books articles etc. when you

  21. like a newspaper. this is the secret

    to becoming a famous expert in blogging. when you do this you will gain a lot of loyal readers. you should try to update your blogging website on a daily basis if you can. this is pretty easy to do. web

  22. you set out the premise as early

    as possible, keep reminding the reader of that premise to keep their attention. the only way you can do this reliably is if you focus on one hook — if you wish to make a more complex point, then you should

  23. buyer.following these steps one can land up

    with the best writing services for search engine optimization for their purpose. as a budding entrepreneur you may like to promote your business online using seo article writing services but if you really desire for effective web promotion you cannot a…

  24. the end of the post. in two

    or three lines, you can just sum up all that you have said in your post.it will leave an impact on the reader’s mind and he will be compelled to think about your post even after he has finished reading. always

  25. go now says:

    has more scratching surfaces and the chances

    to protect your furniture are higher. over the years, i have looked at different blog providers. i have built some pretty nice blogs with some great followings, but i don’t believe in paying for something if i don’t have to and

  26. More Info says:

    which offers blogging capabilities but is considered

    more of a website platform than a blogging platform. there are many other website hosts which offer blogging functions; however, they’re not traditional platforms.when you choose a blogging platform, you’re looking for a few key ingredients. you’re…

  27. the blog writer, maybe you can tune

    out about this part of the content writing, but the clients reading this need to think of the total picture. think about your website’s total page structure. are you pointing your “off page” content at the right places on your website

  28. noticias says:

    writing their full-time job, and more times

    than not, they will not write quality content you are looking for. bidding websites have thousands of freelance writers who bid low on projects hoping to write for you. there are many writers in third world countries who will write your

  29. Recent Blogroll …

    You may take a second to pay a visit to the material from this web pages we’ve linked to on this post…

  30. to begin and they want me to

    tell them how to do it. i’m sure no expert. i used the hunt-and-peck method myself, because i didn’t know who to ask about how to do it. i’m always happy to share what i learned by trial and error, things

  31. him how this post can be beneficial

    for him or by asking an open ended question from the reader. this can be done either in the beginning or the end of the post.check and editit is always advisable to re-read your article to check for any grammatical errors

  32. suri.me says:

    Official Regenerative Institute Vimeo Channel.

    The Regenerative Leadership Institute is the nation’s sustainable living, leadership and permaculture design school. We reconnect people with nature, remembering our collective heritage and creating a beautiful, thriving future. Join us and let’s cha…

  33. Official Regenerative Institute Vimeo Channel.

    The Regenerative Leadership Institute is the nation’s sustainable living, leadership and permaculture design school. We reconnect people with nature, remembering our collective heritage and creating a beautiful, thriving future. Join us and let’s cha…

  34. what says:

    naturally to you, the end result may

    turn out too artificial and hard to follow. be the critic of your own articles, proofread – if it is easy for you to follow and read your articles, then it will be enjoyable for the others too.4. less is more

  35. article without researching for days on end.

    you don’t have to buy a $3000 article writing course to succeed with your writing and become a better writer. sure those courses can help. but if you think about it, who wants shell out such whopping amount just to write

  36. Official Regenerative Institute Vimeo Channel.

    The Regenerative Leadership Institute is the nation’s sustainable living, leadership and permaculture design school. We reconnect people with nature, remembering our collective heritage and creating a beautiful, thriving future. Join us and let’s cha…

  37. good blog names available. well, don’t get

    worried because my short article will help you to pick a good blog name.the domain should be easy to remember, this helps your visitors to remember the name and to visit back later for more interesting articles. if it is hard

  38. write the posts for you. you can

    adjust many of these to search for content at certain intervals (days or weeks) to look for specific keywords for your blog. by doing this you are sure to pull in content that is fresh and also relevant to your page.

  39. You should check this out…

    Here are some absolutely unrelated web-sites to ours, even so, just take a second to visit …

  40. Official Regenerative Institute Vimeo Channel.

    The Regenerative Leadership Institute is the nation’s sustainable living, leadership and permaculture design school. We reconnect people with nature, remembering our collective heritage and creating a beautiful, thriving future. Join us and let’s cha…

  41. students says:

    if there is a way to get

    the job done better in a shorter time frame, its something to look into.a while ago, i got into wordpress cloning, and tried many different methods in the aim of trying to get the most out of my time, and to

  42. can use is indeed wordpress, but for

    many reasons aside from its popularity. there are thousands of free themes that allow you to design your site and many of the themes are customizable.another benefit of using wordpress as a means of developing your seo blog is the vast

  43. 15 pounds says:

    Official Regenerative Institute Vimeo Channel.

    The Regenerative Leadership Institute is the nation’s sustainable living, leadership and permaculture design school. We reconnect people with nature, remembering our collective heritage and creating a beautiful, thriving future. Join us and let’s cha…

  44. education says:

    the top 5 most commented (bottom left

    hand corner) every day because this is where you find the more heated debates about different themes, proving a useful idea of more informal and opinionated spanish writing.manga verde manga verde is a much less in depth blog and covers pretty

Comment posting has been disabled on this doc.