Show Sidebar Log in

Distant Mirrors and the LAMP

This is the text of the talk I delivered at the 2013 MLA Presidential Forum Avenues of Access session on “Digital Humanities and the Future of Scholarly Communication.” Slides (PDF) are available here. Comments welcome.

 

I attended my first MLA convention in 1996. I was a PhD student at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville at the time, and the MLA was just up the road in Washington DC. A bunch of us carpooled. Like many first time attendees, I had earnestly mapped out my convention schedule in the space provided at the front of the program. One session in particular stood out to me to me, premediated (as we now say) with arena rock-like production values: [SLIDE]

The Canon and the Web: Reconfiguring Romanticism in the Information Age,” organized by Alan Liu and Laura Mandell, two names very familiar to contemporary observers of the digital humanities. [SLIDE] The Web presence you see here—one of those distant mirrors of my title—had been placed online months prior to the convention, on May 26th to be exact. As Liu commented in a recent email to me, “I am struck (as you are) by how fleshed out that panel site was.” There are animated GIFs and gratuitous tables, yes, but there is also an evident will to situate the session amid a thick contextual network (the links to associated projects, related readings, and relevant sites); there is a clear desire for interactivity, as expressed through the live email links and the injunction to initiate correspondence; and there is also a curatorial sensibility which seems very contemporary to me, [SLIDE] most notably through the “Canon Dreaming” links which take users to collections of materials assembled by Liu and Mandell’s students—certainly prototypes of what we would today realize through, say, an Omeka installation. [SLIDE] Finally, there were the participants, complete with links to email and home pages alongside the thumbnail bios, an obvious early instantiation of the ubiquitous user profiles we routinely create for social media services. The names here reflect many who have continued to be thought leaders and key practitioners in the space we now call DH, and they were a key element of the panel’s appeal.

The other element, of course, was heralded directly in the session’s title and instantiated in this-then formidable site: the Web itself, which was clearly being celebrated not just as a convenience or contrivance for delivering content, but as a liberating force, a new paradigm, a corrective to the very notion of canonicity. But when I say “the Web itself,” what I really mean is the World-Wide Web, which we then dutifully spelled out complete with conjoining hyphen and glossed with the ghastly descriptor “the graphical portion of the Internet.” This World-Wide Web was not the same Web as the Web we have today, neither technically nor experientially nor aspirationally. There are continuities to be sure, but fewer than you might think. The Web then was still mostly flatland, the dominant issues being the HTML rendering idiosyncrasies of different browsers. (The war between Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator was only just starting to heat up.) The source code for the site invokes the DTD for HTML 3.2. The code itself, according to Liu, was most likely written in an editor called HoTMetaL, from SoftQuad. There is no XML or DHTML here. There is some rudimentary Javascript in the form of an earnest little site navigation widget. There is no commenting facility. There is no feed to subscribe to. There are no Twitter or Facebook sprites. This was 1996. My dearest friends, there was. no. Google. You Yahooed—there’s no shame, we all did—or summoned forth the awesome powers of Alta Vista. Attendees at the 1996 convention would have bragged about their Internet acumen by telling colleagues about ordering a book from something called Amazon.com. Ordering a pizza online you could only do if you were Sandra Bullock in The Net, released a year earlier. [SLIDE]

The real backbone of scholarly communication at the time remained listserv email. There was a rawness to it. You subscribed and you were on, sometimes pending moderator approval, usually more for spam control than anything else. Once you were on, you posted. Or lurked. Or flamed. Or accidentally hit reply-all when you meant to backchannel. But you didn’t have to worry about how many followers you had or if you were popular or pithy enough to be retweeted. You didn’t have to ask someone else if you could be their friend in order to converse with them. Strange, down-the-rabbit-hole geographies of influence formed, where the mainstay of a list would turn out to be a graduate student, or an emeritus at an obscure institution in New Zealand.

[SLIDE] The starting point for any discussion of email in the digital humanities must be the venerable HUMANIST listserv, whose first substantive message [SLIDE] is time-stamped 14 May 1987, 20:17:18 EDT, from one MCCARTY@UTOREPAS. This is, of course, Willard McCarty, who still edits the list to this day. HUMANIST: the name itself reminds us of a time when it was hard to conceive of a need for more than one listserv serving the academic humanities, that most general of titles serving to distinguish it from, say the LINGUIST list, which came along in 1990.

Humanist remains active today, its digests delivered regularly to, I suspect, a number of inboxes in this room. [SLIDE] Some of you may also follow an account on Twitter dubbed @hum_comp. The owner of this account, who wishes to remain anonymous, [SLIDE] is chronologically culling the Humanist archives, starting with the earliest entries, for tweet-length tidbits that either seem quaint or remain relevant. “I was immediately struck,” said the account owner to me via email, “by how similar they sounded to the conversations I [have] been listening to, and tentatively engaging in in 2009/2010. . . [T]he early HUMANIST listers saw much clearer than I ever did in the 1980s and 1990s what the challenges and promises of humanities computing and communication really were, right from the beginning of an expansive networked communication.” Thus: [SLIDE] [SLIDE]

The longevity of Humanist notwithstanding, by 1998 it was clear that many of the scholarly listservs that had sprung up in the first half of the decade were already living out their use horizon. One of the lists that was important to me at the time was entitled H-CLC, which was part of the H-Net consortium. [SLIDE] The CLC stood for Comparative Literature and Computers. In late November, 1997 Nelson Hilton wrote to it: “A growing number of inactive lists, it seems, have folded their tents and disappeared into the electronic night after a ritual call into the void met with resounding stillness. Perhaps it is a sign of advanced maturity in the medium — novelty has long worn off and we return to work at hand. If a list speaks to that work, we pause and read, perhaps respond — otherwise, quite rightly, why bother?” (Mon, 3 Nov 1997 10:33:21) “A sign of advanced maturity in the medium,” Hilton mused. I remind you, this was 1997.

The next Great Migration was to the blogosphere. Even as the lists were folding, the blogs began to spin up, built on nascent social networking scaffolding in the form of blogrolls, comments, trackbacks, and RSS feeds. Blogs are still very much with us today of course, but these were the salad days. Not WordPress or Blogger but Movable Type. Remember MT? [SLIDE] Or maybe you hacked your own. Some bloggers seemed to exist only in the interstices, “comment blogging” as some of us called it, living out their online identities in the long trellis of text that dangled from the bottom of prominent postings. Group blogs were a particularly notable feature of the scholarly landscape, with venues like The Valve, Crooked Timber, Wordherders, and Cathy’s HASTAC becoming daily reads for many wired academics. [SLIDE] For me, the most important such experiment was GrandTextAuto, which for five or six years was host to numerous important and intense conversations in digital studies, electronic literature, computer games, procedural literacy, and what we nowadays call critical code studies and software studies. [SLIDE] Its “drivers,” who included Scott Rettberg, Nick Montfort, Noah Wardrip-Fruin, Andrew Stern, Michael Mateas, and Mary Flanagan, created an active and energetic user community, one with sufficient gravitas and presence to spur the MIT Press to use it as the platform for the open peer review of Wardrip-Fruin’s first monograph, Expressive Processing. Today when I hit the site I get this. [SLIDE] When I emailed Nick to ask for his thoughts he said this to me, among other things: “Those of us who started out as graduate students took on professorial and administrative responsibilities, and there was less time available to play gadfly, perpetrate April Fool’s jokes, and explore aspects of projects through online discussion — instead, we had to write grants, teach classes, supervise graduate students, and so on. So, the heavy burden of responsibility, growing up, and so on.” For my part, I think the rise of Twitter also had a strong impact on the vitality of the blogosphere, even though, as I’ve written elsewhere, blogs and Twitter co-exist with one another in powerful mutually enabling ways.

[SLIDE] Which brings me to the new MLA Commons, launching this weekend here at the convention. [SLIDE] The MLA announcement states that it is intended “to facilitate active member-to-member communication” and “offer a platform for the publication of scholarship in new formats”—language that echoes, among other early electronic exemplars, the Welcome message from the Humanist listserv so long ago. The MLA Commons is built out from the CUNY Commons in a Box package which is built on top of the BuddyPress extensions to WordPress which itself depends on the Linux-Apache-MySQL-PHP LAMP stack of my title, four bedrock open source technologies that all existed, but were in their infancy, at the time of that 1996 Canon and Web panel. Working from the distant and very partially mirrored history of online scholarly communication I’ve been sketching, there are a few propositions I want to leave you with.

First, access always engenders power. Power dynamics are built in to our social networking services at the most basic level—indeed, the ability to define and operationalize various strata of relationship functions—trust, visibility, reciprocity—is arguably at the heart of the read/write Web. [SLIDE] To wit: for the past few days my email inbox has been regularly populated by messages from “MLA Commons” with the subject heading “New contact request.” [SLIDE] I’ve accepted them all, including the ones from people I don’t really know, because the platform is new and my instinct is to err on the side of openness. But I don’t accept all Friend requests on Facebook (nor are all of my earnest solicitations accepted) and I don’t follow back everyone who follows me on Twitter even as I do follow people I’d give my eye teeth to have follow me—but alas, they don’t. As MLA Commons gains steam, at what point do the filters go up, to an extent replicating existing power dynamics in the profession? Do I accept contacts from everyone in my home department? Does someone with a convention interview send contact requests to members of a search committee? If they do, is it presumptuous? If they don’t, are they anti-social in the most literal sense? Do I accept all contact requests from those of a higher professional rank than me? Accept no contact requests from those of lower rank? Anyone who manages their relationships so coarsely is missing the point and very likely has life problems far greater than their facility with online social networking, but given that reputation metrics (whether in the form of Web 2.0 services like Klout or scholarly rankings such as the social sciences’ H-Index) are operationalized in the very marrow of our online media, including digital publications and citations, we’d be mistaken to believe that these concerns are extraneous or can be entirely sidestepped by any mature scholarly communications network. It’s not a reason not to have a Commons, but it is a reason to be mindful of the relational and procedural models built in to its fabric, especially given the varied technologies the end-user experience rests upon.

Access also always entails risk. [SLIDE] I have had a home page on the Web since the summer of 1995. [SLIDE] In 1997 I began writing my dissertation online, not quite “live,” more of a time-shift as I edited and managed different document technologies, but always posting the prose in full, not just excerpts. [SLIDE] My inspiration here was Harlan Ellison, who regularly wrote short stories seated in the window of community bookstores. In 1977 he did it for a full week, a story a day, in a Los Angeles bookshop. I recognized early on that the Web had the potential to be an even more perfect panopticon; no great stretch, but I was also in touch with enough of my baser instincts to understand that visibility and feedback the project seemed likely to attract would entice me and keep me going. Inevitably I was asked whether I was worried about people plagiarizing my work. Again, this was in the era before blogs, and indeed most middle-state writing online; the equivalent of the blog essay, or “blessay” as Dan Cohen has called it, was mostly confined to listservs and text files distributed via FTP drops—very different from the agora of an open Web indexed by even pre-Google search engine technology. My response to the question about plagiary was to invoke another literary authority, specifically Poe’s purloined letter. [SLIDE] Hiding my ideas in plain sight, I argued, was the single best way to get them into circulation and ensure the necessity of referencing and citing them (as opposed to merely swiping them). And for the most part, I was right. The experiment paid real professional dividends. It got my work an audience, airtime in front of the eyeballs I most wanted for it, and the work was judged usually though by no means universally favorably. More I could not ask for, and I carried the same ethos over into my blogging, which began in early 2003. [SLIDE] From the outset I blogged under my own name, and I wrote a response—a blessay, I suppose—explaining why when Ivan Tribble (remember all that trouble with Mr. Tribble?) penned a 2005 piece for the Chronicle of Higher Ed called “Bloggers Need Not Apply.” In the comments I asked others to weigh in with examples of the professional dividends their online identities and reputations had reaped, and I collected several dozen instances further testifying to the power of, as the title of Phil Agre’s classic text has it, “networking on the network.” [SLIDE] I got onto Twitter in 2006, again perhaps just ahead of the adopters’ curve. Nonetheless, I come before you today to say this: I have not blogged every good idea I have ever had. I have not tweeted every insight or reference or revelation. There’s stuff I keep to myself, or better, stuff I release strategically rather than spontaneously, and it will fall to all of us, on MLA Commons and elsewhere, to find our own personal and professional comfort zones regarding what we give out to our contacts and groups, the membership at large, the public at large. Access always entails risk, and while we know scholarship is not a zero-sum game, more tangible and no less sustaining forms of reputation and reward sometimes even often are.

Finally, access always requires time. One scenario, I suppose, is that our online interactions will eventually progress to the point that genre and platform dissolve. Our work becomes our discourse stream, and a comment, a tweet, a blessay, or a monograph will all become part of it, winding more or less tightly within and amid the equally interwoven discourse strands of others. Fuzzy mathematics measuring out influence, recognition, and trust will iterate and calculate in real-time as our conversations thrive, hum, surge, and falter in the collective hive. Rivals will wage guerilla flame campaigns across the endlessly reticulating strata of the network, their memes warring with one other, spawning algorithmic eddies and tides that will buffet entire fields and disciplines. Tenure, if it still exists, may be based on cycles of attention rather than the accumulation of publications—propagate or perish. But I don’t think so. For one thing, platforms are perhaps further from interoperability than ever; Bruce Sterling, for example, predicts that 2013 will be the year of silos and tactically burned and broken bridges. Genres may indeed fray around the edges, but in the end every comment, every sentence blogged and logged, every essay chapter finished and book published is a withdrawal from the finite bank of productivity that is shaped by our individual intellects, our irreducible bodies with all their vulnerabilities, our jobs, our responsibilities, our loved ones, our hobbies and distractions and vacations and time in the woods. [SLIDE] Which is to say that however much attention spans may be redefined and reconfigured—psycho-cognitively, neuro-chemically, and otherwise—most scholarly careers, for now and the foreseeable future, are still going to be measured out in fairly pedestrian ways, in the summer months and three-day weekends and that rare “empty” day during the semester, perhaps on fellowship or sabbatical if we’re lucky and privileged, often at the expense of an hour’s sleep or a movie with the rest of the family when we’re not. Our scholarly communications networks will either cohabitate with the myriad obligations of that ticking temporal complex, or they will lie fallow—most of us are too far out as it is, and not Google Waving but drowning.

So I would leave you with one final urging—that it’s not too soon for MLA Commons to be planning for its own planned obsolescence, or what Beth Nowviskie and Dot Porter have termed “graceful degradation.” Our social (and our scholarly) networks are ever more porous, but they have yet to become reliably portable. This is a problem. Relationship economies require enormous amounts of attention and investment, and for those of us who live active online professional lives, a non-trivial amount of time is devoted to cultivating and aggregating those networks in diverse, subtle, and not-so-subtle ways. [SLIDE] Many of you have seen your own online networks shape-shift across listservs, blogs, and now the newest social media platforms. Universal avatars, imported contact lists, these are stop-gap measures; more promising for the next phase of scholarly communication may be mature personal unique identifiers, [SLIDE] as promised by ORCID, a service that “distinguishes you from every other researcher and, through integration in key research workflows such as manuscript and grant submission, supports automated linkages between you and your professional activities.” I’m currently on Twitter, Slideshare, Zotero, Google+, Facebook, and DH Answers, to name just a few. I want to migrate and port not just my content but also my reputation and relations. Regardless of if or when the MLA Commons folds its tent and decamps into that vast electronic night—hopefully not for a great many attention cycles—what should endure are the relationships it fosters and the work thus performed, the “work at hand” as Hilton put it on H-CLC. [SLIDE] Thank you and yes, do join, and do send me your contacts.

 

Matthew Kirschenbaum

@mkirschenbaum

University of Maryland

 

Tags: access, dh, mla13, s353

Discussion (3)

  1. Please send me the slides. Congrats

  2. Slides are now available from the link at the top of the paper. Thanks!

  3. Thank you for sharing! Almost like having been there ;-)

  4. [...] Matthew. “Distant Mirrors and the LAMP.” MLA Commons/Blog. 5 January [...]

  5. [...] Matthew Kirschenbaum, “Distant Mirrors and the LAMP” delivered as part of the  2013 MLA Presidential Forum Avenues of Access session on “Digital Humanities and the Future of Scholarly Communication”: http://commons.mla.org/docs/distant-mirrors-and-the-lamp/ [...]

  6. [...] “The Mirror and the LAMP,” by Matthew Kirschenbaum “Resistance in the Materials,” by Bethany Nowviskie [...]

  7. [...] Distant Mirrors and the LAMP (from the 2013 MLA Presidential Forum Avenues of Access session on “Digital Humanities and the Future of Scholarly Communication.”) [...]

  8. [...] Text of my 2013 MLA Presidential Forum Avenues of Access session on “Digital Humanities and the Future of Scholarly Communication.” Slides (PDF) are available here. [Also on MLA Commons.] [...]

  9. [...] the field of English, it seems as though we are already talking and interacting in public and online spaces above (or through) the paywall. The purpose of an academic paywall isn’t to protect [...]

  10. about article marketing is that not only

    does it give you more credibility, it can also be done very easily and the visitors you get are extremely qualified.if you spend just one hour, or even 30 minutes, per day writing articles… you’ll eventually develop a very constant flow

  11. readers with them. however their comment section

    is not the place for your guest blog post. next time you read a good article or blog post, leave a little comment and let the author know how you feel about the article. we really do review the comments. in

  12. their questions or solve their problems? be

    polite and give advice and then post those topics on your own blog.after you have been helping people a few times then and only then may you be welcomed to put your link to your blog. you don’t want to start

  13. posts are perfect for increasing traffic to

    your website with long term benefits. are you currently struggling with traffic building? if so, what do you think is missing from your marketing campaign? keep reading and find out what you could do to increase traffic and online conversions.i suggest

  14. of errors and mistakes through not having

    the correct mentor or program to follow.when i decided that i wanted to become a professional blogger, i realised that i needed to learn from the very best without spending a fortune. having tried the niche blogger for free for three

  15. client and show them the before and

    after on each of the search phrases you’re working on. but sooner or later they’re going to look at you and ask why it’s not leading to more sales, so you have to think beyond page ranking to what comes next.check

  16. has become very popular. people blog for

    many reasons. i have found blogging to be enjoyable, i make new online friends, i learn new information, and i can vent if i need to and people listen and offer advice. however, there are some things you should and should

  17. cla vitamin says:

    always advisable to re-read your article to

    check for any grammatical errors or spelling mistakes. even a brilliantly written post loses its charm if there are any grammatical errors.you should read it once or twice to see if it is interesting or not as you are your best

  18. guidelines, mostly. after accepting their bid and

    tasks, you quickly realize it knew nothing. â· if you would be so unlucky to hire a bunch of writers who are naturally not creative, they will produce low quality, boring, rewritten content. â· if you get a bunch of losers

  19. produce perfect blog posts that are free

    from spelling and grammar errors.conversational stylethere are two very important factors to consider when it comes to writing an effective post; they must be informational and they need to be written from a personal standpoint in a conversational styl…

  20. for advance level optimization, i am working

    as a professional but this stuff polish me… made my all concepts clear which were making me confuse. fine information, thanks to the author. this work is really useful and significant. i wanted to thank you for this great read!! i

  21. degree is. it’ll usually be the longest

    piece of writing that you’ve completed, up to that point. i will offer you some advice and help in this article which i have gained from writing my bsc, msc and phd theses as well as from supervising students completing all

  22. no longer just wait passively for the

    teacher to assign homework before learning a topic. he can do his own research to gain a deeper understanding of the subject. he will definitely become happier in school and will learn better. so start blogging now! students must know how

  23. can put their mark on the new

    place, decorate their room, help with the garden, feel involved in establishing a new home.- a house becomes a home when time, love and attention have been lavished on it. but even if you would have remained in the marriage there

  24. household name, at a minimum you need

    to provide: how did your job fit in the employer’s operations? division or corporate? size in sales or number of employees? any subordinates? their functions? without providing details of the context of previous positions the prospective employer is l…

  25. your face (preferably of your good side,

    decently lit); a link to your blog in the url entry; and an attention-getting bio line that drips with your individual verve, but still substantively communicates your writing topics of choice. mine? “web gentleman 2.0 equally skilled in vlogging, tie…

  26. in giving this bit of writing advice.

    if you sound like a rocky and bullwinkle cartoon with a narrator guiding the reader along, you’ve got a problem. if you need to “return” your reader to another scene or another character, then “meanwhile,” is sufficient. better yet, a blank

  27. of the internet, helping individuals, organizations -

    and anyone with something to say – put their voice out there.if you want to start a business blog, you will most likely want to publish the latest information that your customers want to know about your products and services. if

  28. Cornell says:

    the successful online marketers. however, they are

    well established and well known so what chance do you have of competing with them.you need to get your brand well known and become established in your field, you need to be known as an expert in that field.another way to

  29. they are easy to compile and have

    a higher chance of going viral. when you are reading through the top blogs take a conscious look at how many posts are list posts. you will see that a great many of them are. for example…the 8 habits of highly

  30. is relevant and accurate as to what

    you are trying to project. if you do not have interesting and accurate information on your blog it will not get the traffic that you desire.some important steps for blog content writingthere are steps that you can take to make sure

  31. misses can cause even regular writers to

    lose faith in their writing abilities and slack on the quality of content they deliver.at times, writing from the gut is all it takes to land you that awesome writing position for the magazine writing job of your dreams while at

  32. this for me. if you can save

    up to an hour per installation, then that is time better spend on other more important tasks. when it comes to starting your own website you have a lot of options these days. one of the best options that you’re going

  33. restaurant reviews or posting recipes, and that

    was it. now, restaurant reviews are nothing to write home about. they’ve been around as long as society sections have been in newspapers. everyone is used to restaurant reviews.food reviews are now commonplace as well, but they are (or, were, before

  34. an authority, or being perceived as the

    expert, or the go to news source for specialized information in your market. if you are a diet blog for example, focus on one element of diet – i.e. – raw food, or vegan, or juice fasting, etc. it’s much easier

  35. the way in which i had handled

    my client’s experience. the reviewer wanted to see my client “toot his horn” a little more. i want to respond to this issue.avoid anything that suggests you are bragging about yourself. you need to know that anything you put of your

  36. your blog. you can get a blog

    within the next 10 minutes by going to a site called “blogger”, and get your very own site up and running in no time at all. once you’ve created your blog, it’s up to you to start promoting it everywhere on

  37. just write an article and add a

    link back to your blog. like this article has a link, at the bottom, back to my site. another way of getting backlinks is joining stumbleupon, digg, basically the whole lot of bookmarking sites, and after every post, bookmarking it in

  38. pay for. be willing to invest in

    a skilled writer who you can work with over the long-term.how can you teach a writer to write in your style?*show your writer a some samples of your own work. most writers should be able to get a feel for your

  39. get carried away. i have seen far

    too many people who think that a good way to write a website url is to string together a load of popular and relevant keywords. this technique used to get you more search engine visitors and still does with certain search

  40. that ought to include the people, the

    purpose, and the start date.ii) make a plan to measure the effects of the blog.iii) keep a marketing plan ready with detailed maneuvers as to how the company will promote the blog. try to know if your company will use the

  41. of advertising, you can show the ads

    for some particular products. you can use the products from online stores or auctions. as a result, the ads for products will start showing on your blog. these ads will be relevant to the content of your blog.before starting the product-based

  42. tell them. an important aspect of writing

    is deciding what information to provide and what information can be safely omitted. the writer must assume that the audience has limited time to read business documents (handouts and links, n.d., para. 3).so to be a good business writer, business profe…

  43. achieving top ranking in search engines.post titlesany

    blog must have a title. a title highlights what a blog is all about. as a matter of fact, this is a crucial factor that you should be keen on. an attractive title will attract web visitors. on the other hand,

  44. in your selected niche! steve earle is

    one of those rare examples of humanity, like ozzy ozbourne or shane macgowan, who somehow manage not only to survive serious drug and alcohol addiction, but to create great music along the way. like the others, steve paid the price for

  45. best ways to get traffic to your

    blog for free, and i highly recommend you doing this. to find a forum in your niche, go to google and type in “[your niche] forums”. a lot of results will come up. you want to join the forums that allow

  46. pay range varies wildly and it is

    fair to assume the talent level will too. so how do you find the right freelance writer for your particular task?below are six proven steps to help you narrow down the right kind of freelance writer for your job.1. evaluate the

  47. great site that provides great opportunities for

    people of all experience levels.6. writing jobs (us) – yes we have writing jobs available. we have scoured the internet and aggregated all the top writing jobs. these are jobs working directly for companies and they include content manager, technical w…

  48. Dan Anton says:

    people love to read about something controversial.

    generally, you can just write about something that you don’t like, and people will show up and get on their respective soap boxes and tell you exactly how they feel about what you have just written.become a fanthis is the exact

  49. and you do not need to pay

    the outsourced worker until you are completely satisfied with the quality of the work. copywriters, they’re an ethical lot, aren’t they? this question is almost bound to be met with a hushed silence, followed by a slight snigger and finally a

  50. with primary focus on the general web

    readers. and, keep writing abundantly. there’s many different ways to increase your website ranking, and guest blogging is a great way. guest blogging is where you write blog posts for other bloggers and in return you get a back link to

  51. and tremendous effort. it doesn’t just magically

    appear. in this article, you’ll also understand why a blogger mentor or blog mastermind is instrumental in realizing blogging success.numerous amateur bloggers try their luck and struggle to earn over a hundred bucks monthly, which is probably why man…

  52. sorry. it’s worth taking those few seconds

    to backup your wordpress blog so that you can get it back whenever you need to.speaking of getting stuff back whenever you need to, would you write a 50 page term paper in microsoft word and never save it along the

  53. and motivating for your audience. it’s easy

    to find inspiration because we see some form of it every day, it is literally all around. you can use some of that inspiration and share it with your eager audience.parallel comparisonsfind a hot trend that is outside of your niche

  54. Click Here says:

    content. there are various web sites that

    have specific guidelines for writing articles, such as ezine.com, ehow.com, hubpages.com, etc. so an understanding of these guidelines help you get your article published on a web site without having to do any rework. irrespective of any guideline, you…

  55. obrazy says:

    in certain areas of society.generositythis is fun

    one to dig into; you can apply this idea in a variety of ways. for example, how people have been or have not been generous in recent years. you can find certain charities that appeal to you and implore your readers

  56. posts too. if you love to write

    and you are considering trying your hand at writing articles for blogs or website content, there are a few things that you might need to know before you go off on this type of venture. it’s true that you need to

  57. kangen says:

    you can make your blog an interactive

    platform that can help you understand from the readers what is good and what is bad about your business. however, readers will visit your blog only if they find it interesting and not loaded with mundane information. business blogging is one

  58. i’ve written many pillar articles in the

    last few years and this one stands out to me. personal opinion posts are very engaging and give your readers something to think about while visiting your blog. write blog posts that are controversial. controversy is huge for driving traffic to

  59. you are at your creative best is

    important if you want your ideas to flow freely. if morning hours are at a premium, with getting ready for work and exercising, maybe you can journal on breaks or at lunch. keep trying, and you will be able to find

  60. the successful online marketers. however, they are

    well established and well known so what chance do you have of competing with them.you need to get your brand well known and become established in your field, you need to be known as an expert in that field.another way to

Comment posting has been disabled on this doc.